Topic summary
⁠86%2 analyzed articles/videos1,055 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Revenge results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.9% saturation with 1,006 hits. Analysis detected 6,527 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,946 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (8,004 of 16,562 topics). This Revenge is worse (more manipulative) than 51.70% of the peer group.
Revenge
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,946
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

52% percentile
025507510051.7% percentile
3.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.9%8.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.7%2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 16.9%16.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 16.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 15.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos