Topic summary
47%14 analyzed articles/videos6,861 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Retirement Planning results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.6% saturation with 2,248 hits. Analysis detected 26,675 faulty-reasoning hits from 34,057 analyzed words across 14 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 14% (14,036 of 16,212 topics). This Retirement Planning is better (less manipulative) than 86.60% of the peer group.
Retirement Planning

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

13% percentile
025507510013.4% percentile
1.7% BS Score14 analyzed articles34.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.4%5.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.6%6.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.5%5.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.3%3.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos

What The Latest Inflation Report Means For Your Retirement Plan55%
Forbes46%By True Tamplin0%7/23/2026, 1:00:00 PM
Asking Eric: I just want peace in retirement44%
Chicago Tribune10%By R. Eric Thomas33%7/23/2026, 5:01:12 AM
Asking Eric: Mother wants to move, but adult child won’t leave home35%
New York Daily News11%By R. Eric Thomas33%7/23/2026, 4:00:00 AM
I will claim Social Security early. Why do so few people talk about the elephant in the room?11%
MarketWatch7%By Quentin Fottrell13%7/21/2026, 3:30:00 AM
Social Security faces a 2032 shortfall. Newly retired couples could lose $17,000 a year if Congress doesn't act.57%
Yahoo News39%By Jasmine Andersson16%7/17/2026, 4:23:04 PM
‘It’s a scam’: Americans express unease over SpaceX’s influence on retirement savings58%
theguardian.com80%By Maya Yang0%6/19/2026, 12:00:33 PM
How ETFs can be effective building blocks for retirees73%
Fox Business92%By Eric Revell74%5/29/2026, 2:07:31 PM
5 cities that nail the retirement sweet spot48%
Fox Business92%By Eric Revell74%5/18/2026, 12:00:00 AM
Americans rethink Social Security timing as longer lifespans and insolvency fears raise the stakes89%
Fox Business92%By Sophia Compton77%5/14/2026, 4:00:05 PM
How much do you need to retire? A state-by-state breakdown60%
Fox Business92%By Eric Revell74%5/14/2026, 12:00:42 PM