Topic summary
50% 1 analyzed article/video 901 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Retail Regulations results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.4% saturation with 147 hits . Analysis detected 1,792 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,703 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 34% (11,062 of 16,562 topics). This Retail Regulations is better (less manipulative) than 66.80% of the peer group. Retail Regulations
Topic details
Total words: 2,703
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.2% percentile 2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 4.0% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Bandwagon: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Appeal to Nature: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.5% Slippery Slope: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst