Topic summary
⁠23%1 analyzed article/video1,469 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Residency Disputes results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Self-Serving Bias, and Red Herring, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 664 hits. Analysis detected 2,334 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,407 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠22% (12,921 of 16,562 topics). This Residency Disputes is better (less manipulative) than 78.00% of the peer group.
Residency Disputes
Topic details
Total words: 4,407
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

22% percentile
025507510022.0% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 7.5%7.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 15.1%15.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Red Herring: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Horn Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.8%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.6%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.1%Straw Man: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.9%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.3%Special Pleading: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.3%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos