Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video973 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Republicanism results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Hasty Generalization, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 16.4% saturation with 637 hits. Analysis detected 4,202 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,892 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (8,718 of 16,562 topics). This Republicanism is better (less manipulative) than 52.60% of the peer group.
Republicanism
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,892
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

47% percentile
025507510047.4% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 16.4%16.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.9%9.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.2%1.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.7%1.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.8%9.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 19.2%Indoctrination: Topic 16.4%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Straw Man: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos