Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video374 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Republican Senators results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and In-Group Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 154 hits. Analysis detected 1,402 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,496 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (5,676 of 16,562 topics). This Republican Senators is worse (more manipulative) than 65.70% of the peer group.
Republican Senators
Topic details
Total words: 1,496
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

66% percentile
025507510065.7% percentile
3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.4%9.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.9%1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.2%9.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 10.3%10.3%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 6.6%6.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.0%7.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.0%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 2.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Circular Reasoning: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.1%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.4%False Dilemma: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos