Topic summary
⁠91%1 analyzed article/video331 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Republican Party Primaries results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 24.5% saturation with 243 hits. Analysis detected 1,117 faulty-reasoning hits from 993 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7% and a BS Rank of ⁠86% (2,353 of 16,562 topics). This Republican Party Primaries is worse (more manipulative) than 85.80% of the peer group.
Republican Party Primaries
Topic details
Total words: 993
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

86% percentile
025507510085.8% percentile
7.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles993 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 21.8%21.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 24.5%24.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.5%5.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.5%11.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.1%2.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 24.5%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 21.8%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Topic 16.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.1%Burden of Proof: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.4%Recency Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Horn Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos