Topic summary
⁠50%2 analyzed articles/videos2,370 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Renaissance Art results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 1,558 hits. Analysis detected 13,379 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,752 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (11,152 of 16,562 topics). This Renaissance Art is better (less manipulative) than 67.30% of the peer group.
Renaissance Art
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 14,752
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

33% percentile
025507510032.7% percentile
2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles14.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.9%7.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.8%1.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.1%0.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 3.8%3.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.9%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos