Topic summary
⁠74%2 analyzed articles/videos199 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Religious Practice results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Halo Effect, and In-Group Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.2% saturation with 503 hits. Analysis detected 3,027 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,929 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (6,793 of 16,562 topics). This Religious Practice is worse (more manipulative) than 59.00% of the peer group.
Religious Practice
Topic details
Total words: 2,929
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

59% percentile
025507510059.0% percentile
3.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 17.2%17.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 10.9%10.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 14.7%14.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 5.5%5.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 5.4%5.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 17.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.1%Composition/Division: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos