Topic summary
⁠62%2 analyzed articles/videos1,777 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Regulatory Reform results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and In-Group Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 20.7% saturation with 953 hits. Analysis detected 3,488 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,602 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠49% (8,458 of 16,562 topics). This Regulatory Reform is better (less manipulative) than 51.10% of the peer group.
Regulatory Reform
Topic details
Total words: 4,602
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

49% percentile
025507510048.9% percentile
2.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.0%4.0%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 13.1%13.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.3%7.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.1%1.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 20.7%20.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 20.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 1.4%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.1%Middle Ground: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos