Topic summary
49%2 analyzed articles/videos2,950 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Regional Inequality results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 13.6% saturation with 1,425 hits. Analysis detected 11,648 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,467 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 44% (8,863 of 15,753 topics). This Regional Inequality is better (less manipulative) than 56.30% of the peer group.
Regional Inequality
Topic details
Total words: 10,467
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

44% percentile
025507510043.7% percentile
2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles10.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.0%11.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.9%7.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 13.6%13.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.2%6.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.1%0.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.0%7.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.0%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.5%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate