Topic summary
49% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,950 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Regional Inequality results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 13.6% saturation with 1,425 hits . Analysis detected 11,648 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,467 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 44% (8,863 of 15,753 topics). This Regional Inequality is better (less manipulative) than 56.30% of the peer group. Regional Inequality
Topic details
Total words: 10,467
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
44% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 43.7% percentile 2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles10.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 11.0% 11.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.9% 7.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 13.6% 13.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 6.2% 6.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 7.0% 7.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.0%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.5% Slippery Slope: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst