Author summary
92% 1 analyzed article/video 1,333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Austin results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Framing Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 16.6% saturation with 663 hits . Analysis detected 6,321 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,999 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of 81% (1,231 of 6,362 authors). This John Austin is worse (more manipulative) than 80.70% of the peer group. John Austin
Author details
Total words: 3,999
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
81% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 80.7% percentile 4.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 12.3% 12.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 16.6% 16.6% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 12.4% 12.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.9% 6.9% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 9.5% 9.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.1% 12.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 5.5% 5.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 12.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.1%, sitewide 19.2% Halo Effect: Author 16.6%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.9%, sitewide 15.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 12.4%, sitewide 3.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 10.2%, sitewide 11.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 9.5%, sitewide 2.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.2%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.6%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 6.9%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.6%, sitewide 5.3% Slippery Slope: Author 5.5%, sitewide 1.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst