Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,601 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Regional Development results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 23.3% saturation with 1,491 hits. Analysis detected 8,684 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,404 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠68% (5,219 of 16,265 topics). This Regional Development is worse (more manipulative) than 67.90% of the peer group.
Regional Development
Topic details
Total words: 6,404
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

68% percentile
025507510067.9% percentile
4.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.4%7.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 23.3%23.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 16.8%16.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.2%9.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.6%11.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.7%5.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.6%10.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 23.3%, sitewide 6.0%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 19.2%Anecdotal: Topic 16.8%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos