Topic summary
⁠87%2 analyzed articles/videos1,356 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Regenerative Agriculture results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 22.7% saturation with 1,020 hits. Analysis detected 6,008 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,493 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (7,572 of 16,562 topics). This Regenerative Agriculture is worse (more manipulative) than 54.30% of the peer group.
Regenerative Agriculture
Topic details
Total words: 4,493
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

54% percentile
025507510054.3% percentile
3.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.4%5.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.3%9.3%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 7.5%7.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.0%11.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.0%6.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 22.7%22.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 22.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 1.4%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.8%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos