Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,147 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Red Scare results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 38.3% saturation with 1,756 hits. Analysis detected 8,008 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,588 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (4,164 of 16,562 topics). This Red Scare is worse (more manipulative) than 74.90% of the peer group.
Red Scare
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,588
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

75% percentile
025507510074.9% percentile
4.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 38.3%38.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.6%10.6%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 14.3%14.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 16.3%16.3%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 9.8%9.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 8.4%8.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 38.3%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 16.0%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 16.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 2.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 2.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 3.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos