Topic summary
⁠69%3 analyzed articles/videos508 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Recycling results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Optimism Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 815 hits. Analysis detected 6,271 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,084 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (8,622 of 16,562 topics). This Recycling is better (less manipulative) than 52.10% of the peer group.
Recycling
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,084
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

48% percentile
025507510047.9% percentile
2.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.4%9.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.1%6.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.4%13.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.2%2.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.7%1.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 8.7%8.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos