Topic summary
⁠84%1 analyzed article/video3,121 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Recruitment Challenges results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anecdotal, and Biased Writer Voice, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 24.5% saturation with 2,292 hits. Analysis detected 11,355 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,363 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (8,050 of 16,503 topics). This Recruitment Challenges is worse (more manipulative) than 51.20% of the peer group.
Recruitment Challenges
Topic details
Total words: 9,363
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

51% percentile
025507510051.2% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.1%5.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 24.5%24.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 17.8%17.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.5%0.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 24.5%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 18.4%, sitewide 19.2%Anecdotal: Topic 17.8%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.8%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos