Topic summary
⁠48%1 analyzed article/video755 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Reading Instruction results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Framing Effect, and Overconfidence Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 169 hits. Analysis detected 1,386 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,265 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠41% (9,818 of 16,562 topics). This Reading Instruction is better (less manipulative) than 59.30% of the peer group.
Reading Instruction
Topic details
Total words: 2,265
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

41% percentile
025507510040.7% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.5%7.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.7%2.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 4.6%Bandwagon: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.3%Begging the Question: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos