Topic summary
⁠41%3 analyzed articles/videos2,462 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rape Allegations results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Confirmation Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 1,711 hits. Analysis detected 10,676 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,464 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠18% (13,482 of 16,297 topics). This Rape Allegations is better (less manipulative) than 82.70% of the peer group.
Rape Allegations
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 12,464
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

17% percentile
025507510017.3% percentile
1.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles12.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.7%3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.7%13.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.9%0.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos