Topic summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,952 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Publishing Industry results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 2,124 hits . Analysis detected 16,542 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,844 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 25% (12,456 of 16,562 topics). This Publishing Industry is better (less manipulative) than 75.20% of the peer group. Publishing Industry
Topic details
Total words: 15,844
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
25% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 24.8% percentile 2.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles15.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.2% 9.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.7% 5.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.3% 10.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 13.4% 13.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.6% 4.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst