Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Publishers Challenges results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 48.2% saturation with 724 hits. Analysis detected 3,516 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,503 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Publishers Challenges is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Publishers Challenges
Topic details
Total words: 1,503
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 48.2%48.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 17.9%17.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 19.0%19.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.9%13.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 18.8%18.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 11.0%11.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 14.7%14.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.8%5.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.4%6.4%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 6.1%6.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Negativity Bias: Topic 48.2%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 19.0%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 18.8%, sitewide 8.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 17.9%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 11.0%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery Slope: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 1.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 3.7%Anecdotal: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.5%Indoctrination: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos