Topic summary
ā 0%2 analyzed articles/videos411 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Public Reaction results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.5% saturation with 470 hits. Analysis detected 4,038 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,681 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of ā 71% (4,568 of 15,689 topics). This Public Reaction is worse (more manipulative) than 70.90% of the peer group.
Public Reaction
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Uber1%
ā 0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
ā 0%Opera1%
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Privacy Policy1%
ā 71%Public Reaction (selected)5%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 2,681
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

71% percentile
025507510070.9% percentile
4.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.1%13.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.8%5.8%Fundamental Attribution Eā€¦Sitewide 2.7%Topic 8.6%8.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.7%5.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 10.3%10.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 13.1%13.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.8%1.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.9%4.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 17.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 9.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.0%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.1%Horn Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos