Topic summary
⁠29%2 analyzed articles/videos2,691 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Public Pools results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.3% saturation with 1,863 hits. Analysis detected 9,260 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,738 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (7,478 of 15,689 topics). This Public Pools is worse (more manipulative) than 52.30% of the peer group.
Public Pools
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 8,738
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

52% percentile
025507510052.3% percentile
3.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.9%10.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 11.6%11.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.4%13.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.9%10.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 21.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Horn Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.0%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos