Topic summary
⁠32%2 analyzed articles/videos1,561 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Public Investment results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 921 hits. Analysis detected 6,819 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,615 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠25% (11,838 of 15,607 topics). This Public Investment is better (less manipulative) than 75.80% of the peer group.
Public Investment
Topic details
Total words: 7,615
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

24% percentile
025507510024.2% percentile
2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.9%6.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.4%2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.5%7.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 12.1%12.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.5%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos