Topic summary
⁠63%1 analyzed article/video990 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Public Health Surveillance results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Quote-first Misdirection as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 287 hits. Analysis detected 2,252 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,970 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (8,940 of 15,914 topics). This Public Health Surveillance is better (less manipulative) than 56.20% of the peer group.
Public Health Surveillance
Topic details
Total words: 2,970
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

44% percentile
025507510043.8% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.1%6.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 9.7%9.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.7%2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.5%1.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.1%4.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.8%7.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 11.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos