Topic summary
⁠44%2 analyzed articles/videos2,846 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Public Health Initiatives results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 797 hits. Analysis detected 6,348 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,538 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠24% (12,659 of 16,562 topics). This Public Health Initiatives is better (less manipulative) than 76.40% of the peer group.
Public Health Initiatives
Topic details
Total words: 8,538
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

24% percentile
025507510023.6% percentile
2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.8%4.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.3%9.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.0%2.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.7%1.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos