Topic summary
⁠29%1 analyzed article/video440 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Professional Tennis results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Availability Heuristic, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 17.3% saturation with 228 hits. Analysis detected 944 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,320 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (6,008 of 16,562 topics). This Professional Tennis is worse (more manipulative) than 63.70% of the peer group.
Professional Tennis
Topic details
Total words: 1,320
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

64% percentile
025507510063.7% percentile
3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 17.3%17.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.6%7.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 3.5%3.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 6.1%6.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Topic 17.3%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos