Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video937 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Price results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.2% saturation with 795 hits. Analysis detected 4,683 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,748 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 57% (7,238 of 16,562 topics). This Price is worse (more manipulative) than 56.30% of the peer group.
Price
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,748
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

56% percentile
025507510056.3% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 18.0%18.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 15.1%15.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 10.6%10.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 5.0%5.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 15.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 21.2%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 18.0%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 11.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 1.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.0%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos