Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 937 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Price results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Pessimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.2% saturation with 795 hits . Analysis detected 4,683 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,748 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 57% (7,238 of 16,562 topics). This Price is worse (more manipulative) than 56.30% of the peer group. Price
Topic details
Total words: 3,748
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
56% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.3% percentile 3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 18.0% 18.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 15.1% 15.1% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 10.6% 10.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 15.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 21.2%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 18.0%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 11.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 1.9% Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.0%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst