Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos3,234 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Presidential Rhetoric results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 24.2% saturation with 3,126 hits. Analysis detected 16,178 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,936 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (7,821 of 15,476 topics). This Presidential Rhetoric is better (less manipulative) than 50.50% of the peer group.
Presidential Rhetoric
Topic details
Total words: 12,936
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

50% percentile
025507510049.5% percentile
3.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles12.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.3%6.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 17.1%17.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.8%10.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 24.2%24.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 24.2%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 17.1%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 2.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos