Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,396 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Presidential Race results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Overconfidence Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 18.9% saturation with 910 hits. Analysis detected 5,361 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,810 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (7,563 of 16,562 topics). This Presidential Race is worse (more manipulative) than 54.30% of the peer group.
Presidential Race
Topic details
Total words: 4,810
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

54% percentile
025507510054.3% percentile
3.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.9%3.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 18.9%18.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.2%6.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 5.1%5.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 10.3%10.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 3.3%3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 18.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 4.0%Bandwagon: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos