Topic summary
⁠0%4 analyzed articles/videos5,810 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Presidential Powers results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.2% saturation with 4,458 hits. Analysis detected 27,404 faulty-reasoning hits from 25,937 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠27% (12,105 of 16,562 topics). This Presidential Powers is better (less manipulative) than 73.10% of the peer group.
Presidential Powers
Topic details
Total words: 25,937
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

27% percentile
025507510026.9% percentile
2.1% BS Score4 analyzed articles25.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.0%7.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.3%6.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.1%0.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.6%5.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.8%10.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 17.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 2.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos