Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video635 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Precious Metals results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Slippery Slope, and Confirmation Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 282 hits. Analysis detected 2,205 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,540 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 55% (7,470 of 16,562 topics). This Precious Metals is worse (more manipulative) than 54.90% of the peer group.
Precious Metals
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,540
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

55% percentile
025507510054.9% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.2%3.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 9.9%9.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 11.1%11.1%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 8.6%8.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 11.1%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 1.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.4%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos