Topic summary
⁠40%3 analyzed articles/videos1,409 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Postpartum Psychosis results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Availability Heuristic, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 980 hits. Analysis detected 6,787 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,391 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (11,012 of 16,562 topics). This Postpartum Psychosis is better (less manipulative) than 66.50% of the peer group.
Postpartum Psychosis
Topic details
Total words: 7,391
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

34% percentile
025507510033.5% percentile
2.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.1%5.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.3%13.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.1%0.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.3%10.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.0%1.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos