Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Political Wives results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Hasty Generalization , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.4% saturation with 670 hits . Analysis detected 4,799 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,286 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Political Wives is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Political Wives
Topic details
Total words: 3,286
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 15.3% 15.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 14.8% 14.8% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 7.7% 7.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 20.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 15.9% Anecdotal: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 5.2% Hasty Generalization: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 5.3% Unattributed Quote: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 1.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.5%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Composition/Division: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst