Topic summary
⁠47%1 analyzed article/video750 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Political Response results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Ad Hominem, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 16.5% saturation with 372 hits. Analysis detected 1,471 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,250 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (7,309 of 16,562 topics). This Political Response is worse (more manipulative) than 55.90% of the peer group.
Political Response
Topic details
Total words: 2,250
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

56% percentile
025507510055.9% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.7%5.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 5.9%5.9%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 0.1%0.1%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 3.2%3.2%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 16.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.2%Begging the Question: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.4%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.4%Middle Ground: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos