Topic summary
⁠68%2 analyzed articles/videos2,684 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Political Operatives results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Self-Serving Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23.5% saturation with 1,893 hits. Analysis detected 8,162 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,052 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (9,015 of 15,765 topics). This Political Operatives is better (less manipulative) than 57.20% of the peer group.
Political Operatives
Topic details
Total words: 8,052
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

43% percentile
025507510042.8% percentile
2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.6%4.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.5%5.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.2%1.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 7.0%7.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 23.5%23.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 7.9%7.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 23.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 7.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 5.3%Ad Hominem: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 2.2%Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Horn Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos