Topic summary
⁠83%1 analyzed article/video1,742 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Political Finance results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 27.5% saturation with 1,913 hits. Analysis detected 10,861 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,968 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (6,118 of 16,562 topics). This Political Finance is worse (more manipulative) than 63.10% of the peer group.
Political Finance
Topic details
Total words: 6,968
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

63% percentile
025507510063.1% percentile
3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 24.8%24.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.6%12.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 18.9%18.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.1%6.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 27.4%27.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 7.6%7.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 27.4%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 24.8%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 18.9%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.0%Indoctrination: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos