Topic summary
⁠77%2 analyzed articles/videos2,076 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Political Factions results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 13.2% saturation with 825 hits. Analysis detected 6,483 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,228 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (10,161 of 16,562 topics). This Political Factions is better (less manipulative) than 61.30% of the peer group.
Political Factions
Topic details
Total words: 6,228
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

39% percentile
025507510038.7% percentile
2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.7%7.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.2%0.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.4%10.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.6%11.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 13.3%13.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.2%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.4%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos