Topic summary
65% 6 analyzed articles/videos 5,292 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Political Criticism results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 2,227 hits . Analysis detected 24,203 faulty-reasoning hits from 21,401 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 29% (11,138 of 15,690 topics). This Political Criticism is better (less manipulative) than 71.00% of the peer group. Political Criticism
Topic details
Total words: 21,401
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.0% percentile 2.2% BS Score6 analyzed articles21.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.6% 9.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.4% 10.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 8.2% 8.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 7.6% 7.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 8.5% 8.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 8.1% Ad Hominem: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst