Author summary
20% 1 analyzed article/video 2,455 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Angela Hart results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Negativity Bias , and Anecdotal , with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 4.8% saturation with 471 hits . Analysis detected 5,584 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,820 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 8% (6,111 of 6,628 authors). This Angela Hart is better (less manipulative) than 92.20% of the peer group. Angela Hart
Author details
Total words: 9,820
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.8% percentile 1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.7% 3.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.8% 0.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.7%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.8%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst