Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,142 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Playoff Implications results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Recency Bias, and Hindsight Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.4% saturation with 561 hits. Analysis detected 3,260 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,426 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠71% (4,870 of 16,562 topics). This Playoff Implications is worse (more manipulative) than 70.60% of the peer group.
Playoff Implications
Topic details
Total words: 3,426
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

71% percentile
025507510070.6% percentile
4.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.0%3.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 16.4%16.4%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 10.9%10.9%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 7.7%7.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 12.1%12.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.5%3.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 16.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 6.7%Recency Bias: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 2.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Hindsight Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 1.4%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.4%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Circular Reasoning: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.1%False Dilemma: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos