Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Player Relationships results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 22.7% saturation with 701 hits. Analysis detected 3,455 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,084 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,560 topics). This Player Relationships is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Player Relationships
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
⁠0%Player Relationships (selected)0%
Topic details
Total words: 3,084
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 22.7%22.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 12.2%12.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.1%8.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.6%5.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 10.9%10.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Topic 22.7%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 12.2%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.4%Anecdotal: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos