Topic summary
81% 4 analyzed articles/videos 3,980 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Player Performance results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Recency Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 1,924 hits . Analysis detected 13,905 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,367 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 40% (9,658 of 16,092 topics). This Player Performance is better (less manipulative) than 60.00% of the peer group. Player Performance
Topic details
Total words: 13,367
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.0% percentile 2.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles13.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 14.4% 14.4% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Topic 9.0% 9.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 10.3% 10.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Recency Bias: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 2.7% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 4.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.4% Slippery Slope: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst