Topic summary
81%4 analyzed articles/videos3,980 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Player Performance results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Recency Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 1,924 hits. Analysis detected 13,905 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,367 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 40% (9,658 of 16,092 topics). This Player Performance is better (less manipulative) than 60.00% of the peer group.
Player Performance
Topic details
Total words: 13,367
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

40% percentile
025507510040.0% percentile
2.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles13.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.9%5.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.5%6.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 14.4%14.4%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 9.0%9.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 10.3%10.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Recency Bias: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 2.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 4.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.4%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate