Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video907 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tim Rohan results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Overconfidence Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 18.6% saturation with 507 hits. Analysis detected 1,550 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,721 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (1,961 of 6,374 authors). This Tim Rohan is worse (more manipulative) than 69.20% of the peer group.
Tim Rohan
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠70%Tim Rohan (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,721
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

69% percentile
025507510069.2% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 18.6%18.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.3%1.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.9%0.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 7.2%7.2%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 0.5%0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 7.0%7.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 2.7%2.7%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Author 0.2%0.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Halo Effect: Author 18.6%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Author 8.4%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Author 7.2%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.0%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.1%Personal Incredulity: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.0%Halo EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos