Topic summary
12% 4 analyzed articles/videos 657 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Player Injury results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.3% saturation with 331 hits . Analysis detected 3,444 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,267 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 10% (14,945 of 16,562 topics). This Player Injury is better (less manipulative) than 90.20% of the peer group. Player Injury
Topic details
Total words: 6,267
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.8% percentile 1.6% BS Score4 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst