Author summary
0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 1,751 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gary Phillips results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Halo Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 1,071 hits . Analysis detected 9,574 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,224 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 16% (5,252 of 6,244 authors). This Gary Phillips is better (less manipulative) than 84.10% of the peer group. Gary Phillips
Author details
Total words: 13,224
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.9% percentile 1.6% BS Score5 analyzed articles13.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.1% 8.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.4% 1.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 1.0% 1.0% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 6.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst