Yankees baffled Jazz Chisholm Jr. won’t wear cup after nut shot: ‘Protect the McNuggets’ 32%

By Gary Phillips0%

6/19/2026, 10:26:02 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 35 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Negativity Bias, and Status Quo Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 48.1% saturation with 423 hits. Analysis detected 1,955 faulty-reasoning hits from 880 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 40.8% and a BS Rank of 32% (14,638 of 21,230 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 68.90% of the article peer group.

Jazz Chisholm Jr. has swung José Caballero and Aaron Judge’s bats. 
He has stolen Trent Grisham and Giancarlo Stanton’s pants. 
He has even said that he might take his teammates’ undershirts. 
But the Yankees’ second baseman said that he will not ask any of his peers to borrow a cup, the protective device that *some* ballplayers use to guard their family jewels. 
“I’m not asking anyone to use nothing,” Chisholm insisted Friday, “because I’m not wearing a cup.” 
At this point, you may be thinking, *What the hell is Chisholm talking about, how did such a subject come up, and what on earth is this story about? 
* 
If so, you probably missed the Yankees’ game against the White Sox on Thursday, which saw Chisholm exit in the fourth inning after fouling a ball off his own, defenseless cojones. 
Even as Chisholm spent several minutes on the ground writhing in pain, a few of his peers, including Judge, Grisham and Clarke Schmidt, couldn’t help but smirk at their peer’s misfortune. 
Meanwhile, Aaron Boone stood by with the same type of facial expression a father makes when their kid does something foolish. 
He even blew a bubble with his gum as a trainer tended to the distressed Chisholm. 
“Well, there wasn’t much I was gonna be able to do,” Boone, eliciting laughter, said before a reporter showed him a picture of the moment, which belongs in the Louvre. 
“I was just kind of waiting to see if it was gonna subside. 
Obviously, it didn’t. 
But the trainer was down in there, and I didn’t want to get down in there, and it was time to blow bubbles. 
“It wasn’t disrespect to Jazz and the pain he was experiencing, for sure.” 
Fortunately for the Yankees and the ballplayer, Chisholm avoided serious injury, felt better after icing, and was back in the Bombers’ lineup for Friday's 5-0 win over the Reds, which featured a career-high 13 strikeouts and six scoreless innings from Cam Schlittler. 
Always candid, Chisholm had no problem talking about his self-inflicted nut shot before hitting a solo homer, his 11<sup>th</sup> of the year, in the second inning and stealing a base in the eighth. 
“A million,” Chisholm said of the level of pain he experienced Thursday night. 
“If you ever got hit in the testicles, you would know.” 
And yet, Chisholm repeatedly said “hell no” when asked if he’ll wear a cup moving forward. 
He never has, and he doesn’t see why he would start now. 
“I've never worn a cup,” Chisholm said. 
“I've never got hit in the balls. 
Hell no, I'm not gonna change, cause that was an unlucky instance right there. 
“It was mandatory in the minor leagues, and I still never wore it. 
I'm just not a cup guy!” 
Told of Chisholm’s stubbornness, a few Yankees seemed baffled while contributing to what was a humorous session of pregame media availability. 
“You gotta always protect the McNuggets,” catcher J.C. 
Escarra said, making a reference to Adam Sandler’s *The Longest Yard*. 
Boone added that he wore his cup at all times during his 12 years as a player. 
“In December, going to hit soft toss, I put a cup on, OK?” 
the former third baseman said. 
“That's the difference between this generation and my generation. 
I did nothing without a cup, baseball related. 
I think the first time I heard Adrian Beltré didn't wear a cup at third, it blew my mind. 
But now, I know a lot of these guys don't wear cups. 
“Literally, if we were going out for team pictures, and I was getting dressed, I'd be like, ‘Hold on, I gotta put my cup on.’ 
So it's just that it's different now. 
They're playing on some pretty nice fields.“ 
Boone, who does not feel the need to shield his sack when managing, said that he will not perform cup checks on Yankees players moving forward. 
“Not my department,” he said, knowing that nether-regional taps with a bat would likely cause discomfort. 
Maybe doing that would teach Chisholm a lesson, but he explained that he’s never felt the need to wear a cup because he believes in himself as a defender. 
Never mind that he took a below-the-belt shot in the batter’s box on Thursday, or that he made a throwing error on Friday. 
“I mean, if you trust yourself, I guess, yeah,” Chisholm said when questioned if it’s common for infielders to not wear cups. 
“I've never had the reason to wear one. 
Now I have a reason to wear one, but that doesn't mean I'm gonna wear one.“ 
He did say that poor defenders may want to take a different approach. 
“If you don’t trust your hands, I recommend you wear a cup,” Chisholm said. 
“I feel like it's more defensively that you would wear a cup than hitting, but at the same time, I just never thought about wearing a cup.“ 
That lack of consideration bit Chisholm in the crotch on Thursday. 
Thankfully, he came away relatively unscathed. 
Asked if any teammates gave him crap about what ultimately turned into an amusing matter, he said, “Not really.” 
“They just was asking me how my balls felt,” Chisholm said. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Gary Phillips: 0.6%newyorkdailynews: 3.2%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Gary Phillips: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 7.4%Gary Phillips: 2.4%newyorkdailynews: 3.4%Availability Heuristic7.4%This article: 2.5%Gary Phillips: 0.8%newyorkdailynews: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic2.5%This article: 1.3%Gary Phillips: 0.8%newyorkdailynews: 1.0%Hindsight Bias1.3%This article: 2.5%Gary Phillips: 1.4%newyorkdailynews: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias2.5%This article: 6.0%Gary Phillips: 2.2%newyorkdailynews: 6.1%Framing Effect6.0%This article: 4.4%Gary Phillips: 0.3%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Loss Aversion4.4%This article: 10.6%Gary Phillips: 1.9%newyorkdailynews: 0.5%Status Quo Bias10.6%This article: 3.1%Gary Phillips: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect3.1%This article: 8.6%Gary Phillips: 6.6%newyorkdailynews: 2.8%Optimism Bias8.6%This article: 0.0%Gary Phillips: 1.3%newyorkdailynews: 1.2%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 16.6%Gary Phillips: 8.1%newyorkdailynews: 9.7%Negativity Bias16.6%This article: 1.5%Gary Phillips: 1.0%newyorkdailynews: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias1.5%This article: 3.9%Gary Phillips: 0.4%newyorkdailynews: 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error3.9%This article: 3.3%Gary Phillips: 0.5%newyorkdailynews: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias3.3%This article: 2.4%Gary Phillips: 4.6%newyorkdailynews: 1.3%In-Group Bias2.4%This article: 0.0%Gary Phillips: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 3.8%Gary Phillips: 6.1%newyorkdailynews: 4.0%Halo Effect3.8%This article: 0.0%Gary Phillips: 0.5%newyorkdailynews: 0.5%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Gary Phillips: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.2%Gary Phillips: 2.6%newyorkdailynews: 1.4%Recency Bias3.2%This article: 2.2%Gary Phillips: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Primacy Effect2.2%This article: 0.0%Gary Phillips: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Gary Phillips: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 1.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Gary Phillips: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 3.2%Gary Phillips: 3.6%newyorkdailynews: 3.2%Appeal to Authority3.2%This article: 3.4%Gary Phillips: 1.1%newyorkdailynews: 1.1%False Dilemma3.4%This article: 0.0%Gary Phillips: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 1.6%Gary Phillips: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Circular Reasoning1.6%This article: 8.2%Gary Phillips: 3.9%newyorkdailynews: 4.1%Hasty Generalization8.2%This article: 5.9%Gary Phillips: 0.7%newyorkdailynews: 0.3%Red Herring5.9%This article: 2.4%Gary Phillips: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Bandwagon2.4%This article: 9.8%Gary Phillips: 2.4%newyorkdailynews: 7.4%Appeal to Emotion9.8%This article: 0.0%Gary Phillips: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 2.8%Gary Phillips: 1.7%newyorkdailynews: 3.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)2.8%This article: 1.5%Gary Phillips: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Tu Quoque1.5%This article: 0.9%Gary Phillips: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.9%This article: 3.3%Gary Phillips: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Appeal to Nature3.3%This article: 3.8%Gary Phillips: 0.8%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Composition/Division3.8%This article: 23.1%Gary Phillips: 3.5%newyorkdailynews: 2.6%Anecdotal23.1%This article: 0.0%Gary Phillips: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 9.2%Gary Phillips: 1.7%newyorkdailynews: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)9.2%This article: 0.0%Gary Phillips: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Gary Phillips: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Gary Phillips: 0.3%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 6.9%Gary Phillips: 0.5%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Special Pleading6.9%This article: 0.0%Gary Phillips: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 3.3%Gary Phillips: 1.0%newyorkdailynews: 2.2%Unattributed Quote3.3%This article: 1.8%Gary Phillips: 0.8%newyorkdailynews: 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection1.8%This article: 48.1%Gary Phillips: 6.2%newyorkdailynews: 6.8%Biased Writer Voice48.1%This article: 0.0%Gary Phillips: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 3.9%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Gary Phillips: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Gary Phillips: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Gary Phillips: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

880 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers53%attributed speech416writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageJazz Chisholm Jr. • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageAaron Boone • 30 words • 100.0% coverageAaron Boone • 13 words • 0.0% coverageAaron Boone • 3 words • 0.0% coverageAaron Boone • 23 words • 100.0% coverageAaron Boone • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 100.0% coverageJazz Chisholm Jr. • 13 words • 0.0% coverageJazz Chisholm Jr. • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageJazz Chisholm Jr. • 7 words • 0.0% coverageJazz Chisholm Jr. • 7 words • 0.0% coverageJazz Chisholm Jr. • 14 words • 100.0% coverageJazz Chisholm Jr. • 13 words • 0.0% coverageJazz Chisholm Jr. • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageJ.C. Escarra • 8 words • 0.0% coverageJ.C. Escarra • 11 words • 100.0% coverageAaron Boone • 17 words • 0.0% coverageAaron Boone • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageAaron Boone • 9 words • 0.0% coverageAaron Boone • 8 words • 0.0% coverageAaron Boone • 19 words • 0.0% coverageAaron Boone • 12 words • 0.0% coverageAaron Boone • 25 words • 0.0% coverageAaron Boone • 7 words • 0.0% coverageAaron Boone • 7 words • 0.0% coverageAaron Boone • 26 words • 0.0% coverageAaron Boone • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageJazz Chisholm Jr. • 22 words • 0.0% coverageJazz Chisholm Jr. • 8 words • 0.0% coverageJazz Chisholm Jr. • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageJazz Chisholm Jr. • 14 words • 0.0% coverageJazz Chisholm Jr. • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageJazz Chisholm Jr. • 19 words • 100.0% coverageJazz Chisholm Jr. • 11 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Jazz Chisholm Jr.

95%flagged-word coverage
204 attributed words44% of attributed speech96% writer coverage
0%40.0%80.0%Biased Writer Voice-62.2 ptsWriter: 78.4%Jazz Chisholm Jr.: 16.2%16.2%Unattributed Quote+7.8 ptsWriter: 0.0%Jazz Chisholm Jr.: 7.8%7.8%Quote-first Misdirection+7.8 ptsWriter: 0.0%Jazz Chisholm Jr.: 7.8%7.8%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.