Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video857 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Photojournalism Contest results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 202 hits. Analysis detected 879 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,428 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠6% (15,573 of 16,562 topics). This Photojournalism Contest is better (less manipulative) than 94.00% of the peer group.
Photojournalism Contest
Topic details
Total words: 3,428
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

6% percentile
02550751006.0% percentile
1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.7%1.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 5.9%5.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.3%0.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.9%Indoctrination: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos