Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 857 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fontella Bradford results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Framing Effect , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 202 hits . Analysis detected 879 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,428 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 10% (5,971 of 6,628 authors). This Fontella Bradford is better (less manipulative) than 90.10% of the peer group. Fontella Bradford
Author details
Total words: 3,428
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.9% percentile 1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.7% 1.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 5.9% 5.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.3% 0.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.0% 1.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 5.9%, sitewide 0.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Primacy Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.9% Indoctrination: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst