BS Summary: This article contains 16 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Confirmation Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 115 hits. Analysis detected 673 faulty-reasoning hits from 857 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 13.7% and a BS Rank of 3% (21,388 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 97.70% of the article peer group.

Judges have selected eight honorees in the 2026 St. 
Louis Public Radio Teen Photojournalist Prize, including sophomore Logan LaVear of St. 
Louis University High School, selected as this year’s Best in Show prize winner for his photograph "Bathed in Blue." 
“This image was a clear contender for our grand prize recognition based on its composition and the emotion documented from the high school’s kickoff of the football season,” said STLPR Visuals Editor Brian Munoz. 
“The photographer wasn’t afraid to get close to the moment and fill their frame.” 
Other category winners include: 
Best General News: Senior Jack Auer of St. 
Louis University High School 
Best Landscape: Junior Andrew Hammond of St. 
Louis University High School 
Best Portrait: Senior Vincent Hsiao of Ladue Horton Watkins High School 
Best Animals and Wildlife: Junior Ivan Leung of Parkway South High School 
Best Feature: Senior Vincent Hsiao of Ladue Horton Watkins High School 
Best Sports Action: Senior Jack Auer of St. 
Louis University High School 
Best Sports Feature: Freshman Bethany Newsome of Westwood Baptist Academy 
STLPR’s Teen Photojournalist Prize is open to high-school-aged students from all over the St. 
Louis region. 
This year, the Prize received entries from students representing 48 schools across the station’s St. 
Louis, Quincy and Rolla listening areas. 
Photographs were taken on digital, film and phone cameras. 
Each year, the juried contest hosts a panel of photojournalists and media professionals to evaluate the photos in an anonymous judging process. 
Judges look for images that excel in capturing a moment, have strong image composition, display creativity and have compelling captions that reflect the student’s thoughts about the image. 
“The strength of the images we receive in this competition has impressed us every year,” said STLPR Visual Communications Specialist and contest judge Cristina Fletes-Mach. 
“We had the unenviable task of picking a top image and limiting our honorable mentions. 
Even photos that ultimately didn't get honored were spiritedly advocated for. 
This was a difficult contest to judge  in the best way possible.” 
This year’s winning Animals and Wildlife image by Ivan Leung of Parkway South High School, titled "Just Missed," caught the attention of longtime St. 
Louis sports photographer and contest judge Scott Rovak. 
“The timing here is pretty impeccable,” said Rovak. 
“Waiting and preparing for the moment makes this image strong.” 
It’s not often that a particular school pulls off a sweep, but this year, St. 
Louis University High School students were the recipients of three first-place category awards and the Best in Show prize. 
In addition to the Best in Show and category winners, judges awarded 15 honorable mentions across the seven contest categories. 
Brayden Cook of Granite City High School repeatedly caught the judges' eye, earning three honorable mention photos in Feature, Sports Feature and the Animals and Wildlife categories. 
Honorable mentions: 
Feature: Junior MaryKate Stroud of Liberty High School 
Feature: Senior Brayden Cook of Granite City High School 
General News: Junior Jalen Jenkins of Collegiate School of Medicine and Bioscience High School 
General News: Junior Itai Lerman of Clayton High School 
Landscape: Junior Westerly Woods of Pattonville High School 
Portrait: Senior Sam Estrada of Metro Classical and Academic High School 
Sports Action: Sophomore JP House of Christian Brothers College High School 
Sports Action: Junior Ari Duel of John Burroughs High School 
Sports Feature: Senior Brayden Cook of Granite City High School 
Animals & Wildlife: Junior Mason Novak of Christian Brothers College High School 
Animals & Wildlife: Senior Brayden Cook of Granite City High School 
Landscape: Junior Damon Mason of Sumner High School 
Portrait: Senior Lydia Fite of Alton High School 
Sports Action: Freshman Bethany Newsome of Westwood Baptist Academy 
Sports Feature: Sophomore JP House of Christian Brothers College High School 
The exhibition 
All 23 winning photos and honorable mentions will be featured in a framed gallery exhibition and giant screen display in the Public Media Commons at St. 
Louis Public Radio. 
The exhibition kicks off with a free, celebratory reception at 5:30 p.m. on Tuesday, May 19. 
STLPR members and the general public are invited to attend, along with honorees and their guests. 
Please register to attend. 
At the gallery opening, the best in show winner will receive an $800 prize and category winners will receive $200 prizes. 
Photojournalism master class 
Category winners and honorable mention recipients are invited to a master class with STLPR Visuals Editor Brian Munoz. 
For the past three years, the class has also been open on a first-come, first-served basis to all contest participants. 
The 2026 judges 
The 2026 STLPR Teen Photojournalist Prize judges include: 
Scott Rovak, team photographer for the St. 
Louis Blues and the St. 
Louis Cardinals; contract photographer for Imagn Images (formerly USA Today Sports) 
Cristina Fletes-Mach, STLPR visual communications specialist 
Jessica Rogen, STLPR digital editor 
Brian Munoz, STLPR visuals editor 
The St. 
Louis Public Radio Teen Photojournalist Prize is an annual award and educational program. 
Entries are accepted each spring. 
This year's contest was made possible through the generosity of The Mark Twain Boyhood Home & Museum and St. 
Louis Public Radio members. 
You can view all of the winning entries at stlpr.org/prize. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 6.9%Fontella Bradford: 1.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.4%Confirmation Bias6.9%This article: 0.0%Fontella Bradford: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 6.0%Fontella Bradford: 1.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.7%Availability Heuristic6.0%This article: 3.5%Fontella Bradford: 0.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic3.5%This article: 0.0%Fontella Bradford: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fontella Bradford: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 6.5%Fontella Bradford: 2.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 7.3%Framing Effect6.5%This article: 4.2%Fontella Bradford: 1.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.1%Loss Aversion4.2%This article: 2.2%Fontella Bradford: 0.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.0%Status Quo Bias2.2%This article: 0.0%Fontella Bradford: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 1.5%Fontella Bradford: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 4.8%Optimism Bias1.5%This article: 0.0%Fontella Bradford: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.9%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fontella Bradford: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 7.1%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 1.3%Fontella Bradford: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.1%Self-Serving Bias1.3%This article: 1.2%Fontella Bradford: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error1.2%This article: 0.0%Fontella Bradford: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fontella Bradford: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fontella Bradford: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 13.4%Fontella Bradford: 3.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.4%Halo Effect13.4%This article: 0.0%Fontella Bradford: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Fontella Bradford: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.9%Fontella Bradford: 0.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.0%Recency Bias2.9%This article: 3.0%Fontella Bradford: 0.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Primacy Effect3.0%This article: 0.0%Fontella Bradford: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fontella Bradford: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Fontella Bradford: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 12.7%Fontella Bradford: 3.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.6%Appeal to Authority12.7%This article: 0.0%Fontella Bradford: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.3%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Fontella Bradford: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Fontella Bradford: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Fontella Bradford: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.7%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Fontella Bradford: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Fontella Bradford: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 1.6%Fontella Bradford: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 6.6%Appeal to Emotion1.6%This article: 0.0%Fontella Bradford: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Fontella Bradford: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Fontella Bradford: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Fontella Bradford: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Fontella Bradford: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Fontella Bradford: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 4.1%Fontella Bradford: 1.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.6%Anecdotal4.1%This article: 0.0%Fontella Bradford: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Fontella Bradford: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Fontella Bradford: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Fontella Bradford: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Fontella Bradford: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Fontella Bradford: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Fontella Bradford: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Fontella Bradford: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Fontella Bradford: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Fontella Bradford: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.8%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Fontella Bradford: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Fontella Bradford: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fontella Bradford: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 7.5%Fontella Bradford: 5.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…7.5%

857 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers15%attributed speech727writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageBrian Munoz • 34 words • 0.0% coverageBrian Munoz • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageCristina Fletes-Mach • 25 words • 0.0% coverageCristina Fletes-Mach • 15 words • 0.0% coverageCristina Fletes-Mach • 11 words • 0.0% coverageCristina Fletes-Mach • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageScott Rovak • 8 words • 0.0% coverageScott Rovak • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Brian Munoz

100%flagged-word coverage
48 attributed words37% of attributed speech46% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -8.8 ptsWriter: 8.8%Brian Munoz: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.